Cross Exam of Indian Judges

October 27, 2009

Cross Exam of Indian Judges
S.O.S – eVoice For Justice – e-news weekly
Spreading the light of humanity & freedom

The following live case is an actual example for failure of judiciary & police in india. It is a perfect case study for students of law , university graduate students , lawyers / advocates , police , judges , human rights / civil rights activists , groups , NGO in india & elsewhere.


Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake encounters ?
Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree torture on prisoners ?
Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals & backstabs our motherland , it’s national security ?
Q4. Don’t the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law & order ?
Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking any action with respect to them ?
Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth & provide timely justice ?
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action against the rich & mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this double standard ?
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants don’t give full , truthfull information. Still , police / courts don’t take action against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an “amicus curie” before jain commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases & by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police & intelligence personnel about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ?
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police responsible for it ?
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses & all parties involved , both during case & afterwards ?
Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in their family’s wealth year after year ?
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check candidate’s background. However is there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to national secrets ? why ?
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front running candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than half the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded & aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has funded & aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just & legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded & aided couter terrorist groups , is it right & legal ?
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained & funded “salwa judum” to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action of government just & legal ? india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements & attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms & ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty & rich ?
Q23. Law is one & same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich & poor ? why this differentiation ?
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all it’s products come with IMEI number only & stated that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their’s as it doesn’t have IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they don’t have any business relationship with either tata indicom or it’s dealer. However the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but doesn’t have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets & cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are doing
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file “B” report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in investigation ?
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be closed with “B” report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ?
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any basic requirements ?
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG & IG of police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police & intelligence personnel ?
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court cases & can concentrate on their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesn’t cover the individual actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission & home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to destroy evidences. Is it right & legal ?
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other people’s representatives are facing criminal charges ?
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ?
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other people’s representatives are wanted by police in various cases . but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office before naturalization ?
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign origin ?
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin & while they are on foreign tour , from national security perspective ?
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi’s family received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party comes to power all the cases involving it’s partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution fails to prove it’s case & prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case involving shiv sainiks & others , when shiv sena – BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against it’s partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just & legal ?
Q48.what damages has been done to india’s national security due to mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?
Q49. What action by the government ?
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years & acquitted by courts upon finding them as not guilty ?
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters & 3rd degree torture ?
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations , 3rd degree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappan’s territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not why ?
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my “fundamental duty” hereby do offer my conditional services to GOI & GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more & even their family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government provide insurance coverage to police & their family members on the lines of defense forces ?
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable & his family ?
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human rights ?
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the control of police department ?
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings & subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is it right & legal ? this happens mostly in real estate matters.
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various kidnappings ?
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if not why ?
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him any judicial work ?
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?
Q78. how ? if not why ?
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth in the name of judge’s family members ?
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement & meating out injustice ?
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the accussed – judges are not subjected to tests like “poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc” , in the interest of justice & truth ?
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of “Karnataka state government judicial department house building co-operative society”. Then how come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society & allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at said society’s – judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the whole thing grossly illegal ?
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court which is handling that tortured person’s case responsible for it ?
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges & the police officers for committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder & murder ? if not why ?
Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit ranking for the post of peon.
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.
Q91. when a person doesn’t get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that person’s case responsible for it ? what action ?
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners ?
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence & gives him 3 months sentence. What about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action against the judge in such cases ?
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years & finally the judge finds them as innocents & acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what action against the judge ?
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions & the actions arising out of misuse of office ?
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges & their personal actions as individuals ?
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes – scheduled caste , scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities & women are their in supreme court , state high courts & subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges & to check corruption in judiciary ?
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings , parties , at the tax payer’s expense ?
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill & claimed traveling allowance ?
Q106. what action has been taken against – selectors ie Karnataka high court judges & newly selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?
Q107. when common people / tax payers & even government employees are not getting proper health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right & just to provide premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in India , abroad , all at tax payer’s expense ?
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health , mental faculties & mental balance in the midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest litigations ?
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing “amicus curie” in a case ?
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an “amicus curie” in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination case , was not considered by the court ?
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such cases ?
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy person’s rights violation ?
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during hearing of the case & afterwards ?
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?
Q118. when the corrupt police officer & government prosecution advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to fail the case – to cover-up rich crooks , high & mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper & fair prosecution of cases against rich & mighty ?
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you – the honourable court ready to utilize it ?
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India , through government of india’s on-line grievance system ( DPG & DARPG ) :
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 , DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available at following web pages , , , , ,
what are the status of those appeals ?
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes – rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court , constitution of India & citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution of India & citizens of India ? please answer.
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemen’s family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen & their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ?
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense forces.
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel & pay it as compensation to victims of police failures & atrocities ?
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any constitutional office ?
Q133. during british rule in india & various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India & other british colonies. After india’s independence what happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue with the prosecution ?
Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or it’s colonies , to face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred the application to some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary has got copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI request ?
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND & prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences & prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such advocates in practice ?
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article 21) ?

Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators & parliamentarians by the constitution of India?

a) Inside the House b) Outside the House

Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like

a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India

c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC

e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.

Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional functionaries ?

a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.

b) Cover both their official & personal actions.

Q146. Are the privileges defined & codified ?

Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?

Q148. Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or below ?

Q149. Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House of commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and court of records ?

Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of Lords in England ?

Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?

Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives & executive ? does not it amount to infringement of Judicial powers & contempt of the court by the House.

Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?

Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of official’s secret act & go unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges

Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?

Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payer’s money, they get their pay, perks & lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ?

Q157. Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks & lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more
valid) in a democracy ?

Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?

Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?

Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?

Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?

Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public Interest Litigation” ? In some cases, the Public or the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.

Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal aid ?

Q164. Communication – free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of Citizens ?
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just & legal ? give me the names of accused judges & description of charges against them ?
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses & brain. That is why the acts & sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects & produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police & judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them & to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of police & judges in drunken state legal ?



DATE : 05/09/2009 ………………………NAGARAJ.M.R.

RTI APPEAL Via Web NEGLECTED TILL DATE by Honorable Supreme Court Of India



Honourable Registrar ( ADMN ) / Apellate Authority,

Supreme court of India,

New Delhi.

Subject : RTI APPLICATION NO : dated 18.12.08 appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07

On-line grievance no: DPG/M/2009/80057

Kindly go through the following articles & provide justice by giving complete
truthful information to us. Till date , you have not replied to my appeal sent
through e-mail , why ?

answer the following questions , why public servants are afraid to answer it ?
what they are hiding ? , ,

The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect & uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic institutions , to protect our national integrity , to respect & protect the rights of our fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has the right to obstruct the discharge of these duties by citizens of India. No legal privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF CITIZEN’S OF INDIA.

We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India & by birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals. To express ourselves , we need information , data feed back , to ascertain whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether we are getting equitable justice , etc , we need information . so , basically Right To Information is an inalienable part of our fundamental rights & human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time limit , responsibilities of public servants up to certain extent. However the citizen’s fundamental right & human right to seek information extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act.

Hereby , we seek complete truthful information from supreme court of India , with respect to my RTI application appeal no : APPEAL NO. 91 / 2007 & Dy.No.541/RTI/08-09/SCI DATED 18.12.2008 . HEREBY , WE ARE ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN PUBLIC INTEREST & JUSTICE. Hereby , we request you to register this appeal as a PIL petition & to ascertain the stand of apex court on various matters raised in my RTI Application , in public interest & euitable justice. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.

Your’s sincerely,


RTI APPEAL Via Web NEGLECTED TILL DATE by H.E.Honorable President Of India


Smt. Rasika Chaube ,

Internal Financial Advisor & Appellate Authority ,

President’s Secretariat ,

Rashtrapati Bhavan ,

New Delhi.

Subject : RTI APPLICATION NO : 1119/RTI/12/08-09

On-line grievance no: DPG/M/2009/80058

Kindly go through the following articles & provide justice by giving complete truthful information to us. Till date , you have not replied to my appeal sent through e-mail , why ? answer the following questions , why public servants are afraid to answer it ? what they are hiding ? , ,

The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect & uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic institutions , to protect our national integrity , to respect & protect the rights of our fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has the right to obstruct the discharge of these duties by citizens of India. No legal privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF CITIZEN’S OF INDIA.

We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India & by birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals. To express ourselves , we need information , data feed back , to ascertain whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether we are getting equitable justice , etc , we need information . so , basically Right To Information is an inalienable part of our fundamental rights & human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time limit , responsibilities of public servants up to certain extent. However the citizen’s fundamental right & human right to seek information extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act.

Hereby , we seek complete truthful information from H.E. Honorable President of India , with respect to my RTI application appeal . HEREBY , WE ARE ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN PUBLIC INTEREST & JUSTICE. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.

Your’s sincerely,


Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ #LIG-2 / 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSORE – 570017 INDIA … cell :09341820313
home page : home page : , , , , , , ,
contact : ,

Police NOT Registering Complaint
S.O.S – eVoice For Justice – e-news weekly
Spreading the light of humanity & freedom






MYSORE – 570017.


Honourable DG & IG of Police ,

State Police H.Q ,



Honourable Circle Inspector of Police,

Vijayanagar Police Station,


Honourable Sir,

Honourable Chief Jusice of India & H.E.Honourable President of India
& other public servants

In India , as per constitution of india all citizens are

equal , have right to equal oppurtunity &

equitable justice irrespective of caste , creed , religion , etc. the

constitution has guaranteed these to every indian

citizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also , every

humanbeing on earth has got HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of

his / her birth.


SERVANTS have forgotten this & are acting as lords ,

autocrats – unquestionable public masters. CONSTITUTIONAL

FUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS appointed to serve the public,

public are the kings of democracy , they are the taxpayers &

paymasters of this very same public servants.

In India , corruption has spread it’s tentacles far &

wide , it has not even spared the judiciary. The last

resort of commonman for seeking justice is judiciary , even there

corruption has spread.In present day India , if one

is rich , he can committ any type of crime & get away clean from

courts of law. there are corrupt police officials

who modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences , takes up

different line of investigation , fix innocents ,

coughs-up false confessions from innocents by 3rd degree torture ,

file B report closing the case , decides not to

appeal in higher court of law , etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see the

list of millionnaire police officials who are

caught by karnataka lokayukta.

Next step , the prosecutor & defense advocate strikes a

deal , manipulates evidences , manipulates way

of presentation of case & way of argument favouring the rich crooks

for a price , as observed in high profile

BMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN & defense counsel RK

ANAND. In this way , if corrupt police & advocates ,

together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge is

left high & dry eventhough the judge is honest,

he is left helpless. to add to this , when the judge himself is

corrupt , people’s last hope , democracy is dead. nowadays

we are hearing too many reports of irregularities in judiciary.

our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTEREST

LITIGATION before hon’ble supreme court of india,

but the vested interests there are not accepting it as PILs. WHAT DOES



The issues raised by us for sample :

1. sale of fake medicines & adulterated food products , beverages ,

colas affecting the health of millions of indians

& public of importing nations who are importing the same dangerous

products from india .

2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits ,

tribals , backward castes by government authorities

whereas regularising illegal land encroachments , illegal buildings

by high & mighty people in total disregard to law.

in some cases government has even made contempt of court , by defying

court orders & enacting special laws all to favour rich land grabbers.

3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws ,

pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies.

4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servants

leaking india’s defense secrets to foreign countries

& some politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by anti

nationals DAWOOD IBRAHIM & underworld dons in gulf

countries & elsewhere.

these type of appeals are for public good , national

security , as public are affected by them. still supreme court of

india is not considering

our repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to consider

even a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courts

even have the right to initiate suo-motto action for public good ,

inspite of absence of any appeals / complaints.

over & above this at the time of my very first appeal my income was

very low & i was a retrenched factory employee who was eligible

for free legal aid, even free legal aid was not given to me.

Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals the Honourable chief

justice of India & H.E.Honourable President of India

are not giving the requested information . these action of CJI &

PRESIDENT OF INDIA is aiding high & mighty criminals , anti

nationals ,

amounts to suppression of information , truth , evidences , which is a

cognizable offence.


INDIA – , , , , ,





, ,




are you ready to catch tax thieves ? , ,


reliance industry where is accountability ? , ,

crimes at infosys campus , ,

crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman , ,

crimes of land mafia in India , ,

currency thefts in RBI Press , ,

killer colas & killer medicines of India , ,

We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies ,

public servants , but it is an appeal to the

honest few in public service ,to bring to book their corrupt

colleagues.The Honourable Chief Justice of India & H.E.Honourable

President of India

have violated their oaths of office , failed in their constitutional

duties , suppressed material truths / informations & thereby


violated my Constitutionally guaranteed FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & BASIC

HUMAN RIGHTS & Obstructing me from performing constitutionally


Hereby , i do

request you to legally prosecute the below mentioned public servants

1. H.E.Honourable President of India
2. Honourable Chief Justice Of India
3. Union Home Secretary , GOI
4. Governor , Reserve Bank Of India
5. Director-General & Inspector General Of Police , government of
6. Commissioner , Bangalore Development Authority
7. Commissioner , Mysore Urban Development Authority
8. Commissioner , Mysore City Corporation
9. Labour Commissioner , government of karnataka and
10. all public servants belonging to tax dept , pollution control
board , etc mentioned in the above cases with web links.

on the above mentioned charges. the whole issue of this news paper &

the related materials at the weblinks provided, forms part of this

complaint. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where
for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result
like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the
government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me
the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for
questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police
station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this
type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or
investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my
family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents ,
loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above
mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if
criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against
me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be

if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government
of india is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors
of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,
then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare
Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears
from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police
officials , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries. thanking
Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.

Date : 04.07.09………………… your’s sincerely,

Place : Mysore…………………. nagaraj.m.r.

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ #LIG-2 / 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSORE – 570017 INDIA … cell :09341820313
home page : home page : , , , , , , ,
contact : ,



March 9, 2008



e –  Voice Of Human Rights Watch – e-news weekly
Spreading the light of humanity & freedom

Editor : Nagaraj.M.R…………vol.3 . issue.04………….07/04/2007

 Editorial : education  sevice or  money spinning business – crimes by educational institutions _ an appeal to honourable  supreme court of India

Education is a wealth which must be shared with the needy & education alone elevates human beings from all miseries. Keeping this in mind in the olden days numerous philanthropists have donated buildings , lands , money to educational institutions. Keeping the same objective in mind & knowing fully well about rampant illiteracy in India resulting in various social problems , our constitutional frame workers made literacy  of masses a priority for every government & part of  directive principles of our constitution.

Now , various politicians , their cronies  some of whom are not even matriculates  are  opening schools , colleges , professional institutions not to serve society by providing education to the masses. But to make money , as education is a no loss only profit business. Are these people opening these educational institutions as corporate bodies which legally permits them to indulge in educational businesses, NO. They form charitable trusts & educational institutions as part of those trusts with the avowed objective of serving the society , needy poor persons & to provide them education. Therby , they get prime lands , CA sites from government authorities at concessional rates , they get tax cuts , they import instruments & equipments at concessional rates with duty exemptions. The government  extends all these benefits to those trusts to serve the poor. However , these trusts never admit poor persons to their institutions , they extract huge  donations from parents of students. Sometimes they give fictious receipts , some don’t give any receipts at all. The trustees never remitt those donations to the trust account. After paying such huge donations , still those parents are not admitted as members of the very same trust, lest they speak out against  trust fund misuse. So, naturally the trust cheats the government of the taxes which ideally it must pay.

Many schools & professional colleges even lack the basic educational infrastructure to provide education , still they are running the show since years . courtesy corrupt public servants. Take the recent government of Karnataka education department order , which has ordered to shut down more than 22200 schools in Karnataka state. These 2200 schools were functioning since years teaching students in English medium although they were legally permitted to teach only in kannada medium.  The range A.E.Os , E.O , B.D.O everybody were aware of this but kept mum as bribe money was in their mouth , the only persons who didn’t know the truth were hapless parents.  The schools gave wide advertisements , pamphlets  inviting admissions for English medium schools , even on the boards of school , school stationeries , receipts , etc , it is mentioned as ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL. So , in this mass cheating act  of educational institution managements together with corrupt government servants  , now hapless parents  & careers of budding young children  is getting a beating. The shameless double act of government  now to close down these schools is not right , the government should have done this in the very first year of these educational institutions. These managements have cheated the parents & also violated the faith of the consumer .

Hereby , we do humbly request you to register  cheating case against  managements of  these 2200 educational institutions together with respective range A.E.O , E.O , B.D.O as per  IPC and to  provide relief , compensation  to parents of students as  per consumer act.

Jai hind. Vande mataram.

Your’s sincerely,



Recently in the last week , Karnataka lokayukta sleuths have caught
redhanded the joint director of DG E&T at mysore while taking bribe to
sanction financial grant in aid to private I.T.Is. this is the second
time that official has been caught by lokayukta sleuths. This is just
one case , In DG E&T there is corruption galore , students pay bribe
to get attendance , to get internal assessment marks , etc. the staff
pay bribe to DG E&T officials to get grants , to get heir monthly
salary bills passed , to get affiliations , etc.

The problem in private I.T.Is are so acute that , certain institutions
promoted by people with political connections don’t have adequate
training infrastructure for students , staff strength – students to
teacher ratio is less than the norm , portions are not thought
properly nor completed in time , the students even lack basic
necessities like urinals – the fate of girl students only god must
assist. The miracle such institutions are functioning since years &
have even got government financial grant in aid .

In such private I.T.Is , the corrupt managements have recruited only
forward caste people who can pay bribe . the managements in league
with corrupt DG E&T officials have extracted bribes from the staff
members to secure government grant in aid , also every month the
managements recover 25-30% of salary from the staff without any receipt.

The end looser in all these the STUDENTS. How come these private
I.T.Is who have only employed forward caste people , lacking adequate
teaching infrastructure have got affiliations from the government ?
how come they are functioning since years in this fashion ? how come
they have got government financial grants , while private I.T.Is run
by honest managements providing proper infrastructure to students &
employing staff irrespective of religion or caste , are struggling to
get government grant in aid ? the miracle is enacted by the people
like above stated corrupt ones .

 Is the election in Uttar Pradesh a contest between criminals? 

Criminalisation of politics in India is a growing problem, despite legal attempts to address it. In 2003 a law was introduced to prohibit the election of criminals or alleged criminals to state or central legislature. However, persons with criminal or alleged criminal backgrounds continue to hold seats in parliaments all over the country. In fact, current statistics show that some 23.2 per cent of members of parliament in India have criminal investigations or cases pending against them. The forthcoming state election in Uttar Pradesh is a case in point. An estimated 35 per cent of candidates have trials and cases pending against them. The charges include rape, armed robbery and murder.

The primary reason for criminal elements gaining political power is the failure of rule of law. When justice becomes distant and elusive, alternative platforms surface to deliver so-called justice through muscle power. Criminals protect the illegitimate interests of politicians and in turn obtain protection from them and their parties. This mutually beneficial relationship works against the establishment of the rule of law. As a consequence, the criminal justice system is increasingly corrupted and manipulated. This decrepit state of affairs is essential to the continued criminal hold on parliaments across the country, as reasonably well-functioning police, prosecutors and courts would be a death blow to those in control.

The election commission and parts of government have set down norms and appointed committees, with little effect. The Vohra Committee report paints a grim picture of criminal elements in politics and has made various suggestions, as has the National Committee on the Review of the Working of the Constitution. Based on this information, the Election Commission of India has filed a number of proposals for the consideration of the Government.

The judiciary has also made directives concerning the writ petitions filed by the Association for Democratic Reforms [ADR] and the People’s Union for Civil Liberties [PUCL] in May 2002. The central government failed to take any legislative initiatives to bring greater transparency to elections in response. However, the Election Commission of India the following month mandated disclosure of criminal records of electoral candidates–including convictions, charges pending and cases initiated, financial records and assets and liabilities of a candidate, their spouse and other close relatives.

To circumvent this order, the government drafted an ordinance with provisions expressly in violation of the Supreme Court’s directives and Article 19 (1) of the Constitution of India. In August 16 2002 the government sent the ordinance for the president’s approval. However, concerned citizens and activists got together under the banner of the National Campaign for Electoral Reforms and pressured the president to refer the matter under Article 143 of the constitution to the Supreme Court. The president returned the ordinance to the Indian parliament for reconsideration on 23 August 2002. But the cabinet reiterated its position against disclosure of details of the candidates for election and simply returned the ordinance to the president, who had no other option by law but to promulgate it.

The Lok Satta, PUCL and ADR challenged the constitutionality of the ordinance in the Supreme Court, which on 13 March 2003 struck down the amendment brought in by the ordinance by holding that Section 33B of the Representation of People’s Act of India is unconstitutional. It also held that the parliament cannot abridge the right of the citizens to know about the candidates and for all practical purposes declared that the notification issued by the Election Commission of India must be made law.

As of now candidates to an election are obliged to submit an affidavit in a prescribed form declaring assets, liabilities and criminal antecedents. Furnishing of wrong information is an offence and on proof the election of the candidate is invalid.

To exercise freedom of speech and expression there must be freedom of choice, which depends upon the right to be informed. Citizens have every right to know about the persons whom they prefer as their representatives. This is a fundamental right under Article 19 (1) of the Constitution of India. The guidelines issued by the Election Commission of India mandate the presiding officer of a district to provide information about the candidate to anyone who claims and denial of such data is illegal.

The political parties of India have a moral and legal responsibility to weed persons with criminal records or pending allegations out of their ranks. Their minimum duty is to provide citizens with a genuine choice for representatives, not persons seeking to use state resources to defend themselves and their cronies. The Asian Human Rights Commission calls on them to start in Uttar Pradesh, where the present dismal choice of candidates leaves little hope for the future of India’s claim to be the world’s largest democracy.

<!–[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]–>

Dear Sir , 

INDIA: Dalits allegedly beaten up by upper caste and police refuse to register a case

Name of victims:
1. Mr. Chhotelal, son of late Shivnath, aged 60 years
2. Ms. Roopa, daughter of Shankar, aged 50 years
3. Mr. Shankar Ram, son of late Shivnath, aged 50 years
4. Ms. Roma, daughter of Shankar, aged 14 years
5. Mr. Lalchan Ram, son of Suddhu, aged 45 years
6. Ms. Lalmani, daughter of Sitaram
7. Mr. Roop Chandra, son of Bhullan Ram, aged 50 years
8. Mr. Dharmendra, son of Banarasi, aged 10 years
[all are residents of Dasanipur village within the jurisdiction of Phoolpur police station, in Harahua block, Varanasi district, Uttar Pradesh]

Alleged perpetrators:
1. Mr. Vijay Kumar, son of Sharada Patel, aged 20 years
2. Mr. Munna Lal, son of Sharada Patel, aged 25 years
3. Mr.  Kumar, son of Vanshulal, aged 32 years
4. Mr. Durga Prasad, son of Bhagwan Das Patel, aged 30 years
5. Mr.  Mahajan, son of Bhagwan Das Patel, aged 27 years
6. Mr.  Jay Singh, son of late Ram Kewal Patel, aged 25 years
7. Mr. Naresh Kumar, son of Chauthi Patel, aged 40 years
8. Mr. Anil Kumar, son of Mahendar Patel, aged 20 years
9. Mr. Nikku, son of Harilal Patel, aged 20 years
10. Mr.  Munna Lal, son of Sukharan Patel, aged 30 years
11. Mr. Harilal, son of Moti Patel, aged 20 years
12. Mr. Vinay, son of Moti Patel, aged 30 years
13. Mr. Vinod, son of Phulchan, aged 30 years
[all are residents of Dasanipur village within the jurisdiction of Phoolpur police station, in Harahua block, Varanasi district, Uttar Pradesh]
14. The Station Officer of Cholapur Police Station, Varanasi district, Uttar Pradesh

Date and place of Incident: 27 and 28 of March at Dasanipur village

I am writing to voice my concern against the alleged assault of the members of the Dalit community by the members of the Patel community in Dasanipur village on 27 and 28 March 2007, in Harahua block of Varanasi district, Uttar Pradesh state, India. I am informed that a small brawl between the children of both communities regarding a dance party have taken a serious turn whereby the members of the Dalit were intimidated and assaulted by the members of the Patel community of the village. I am also informed that the members of the Patel community allegedly attacked the house of Mr. Shankar and assaulted his daughters Ms. Roma and Rupa. I am also informed that the house and household utensils were destroyed in the attack.

I am concerned to know that when the injured from the Dalit community were admitted to the Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital in Varanasi they were allegedly denied treatment against which they have lodged a compliant with the Chief Medical Officer, Varanasi. I am also informed that the Station Officer from the Cholapur police station who visited the Dalit houses on a complaint filed by the Dalits in fact did not register a complaint against the assailants, but allegedly took into custody two Dalits – Ram and Paras into custody and assaulted them in custody and booked them with a false case along with 10 other members of the Dalit community.

I am aware that any assault or insult in public of a member of the Dalit community is an offense punishable under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. I am surprised about the manner in which the local police have handled the issue without registering a case against the perpetrators under the provisions of this Act.

I therefore urge you to immediately intervene in this case by initiating an independent inquiry into the case. The alleged assault of Ram and Paras at the Cholapur police station and also the refusal by the doctors and nurses at the Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital to give adequate treatment to the injured Dalits must be inquired into. I also request you to ask the Senior Superintendent of Police to investigate the matter and register a case against the perpetrators named above under the provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

I trust that your intervention will be forthcoming in this matter.

Your’s sincerely,




Dear  Sir ,

INDIA: Death of a woman in suspicious circumstances and local police failing to investigate the case properly

Name and address of the victims:
1. Ms. Kashmira Khatun, aged 16 years , daughter of Sk. Mainuddin, resident of Khelser Chak village, Purba Bhagabatipur, under the jurisdiction of Chanditala police station, Hoogly district, West Bengal state
2. Mr. Ensan Mallik, son of Korban Mallik, residing at Koleypara village, Purba Bhagabatipur, under the jurisdiction of Chanditala police station, Hoogly district, West Bengal state
3. Mr. Subrata Koley, son of late Fatik Koley, Koleypara village, Purba Bhagabatipur, under the jurisdiction of Chanditala police station, Hoogly district, West Bengal state
Date and time of incident: 23 October 2006 at about or after 10pm
Place of incident: Koleypara village, Bhagabatipur, Hoogly district, West Bengal
Alleged perpetrators:
1. Mr. Tapasbrati Chakraborty, the Officer in Charge, Chanditala police station, Hoogly district, West Bengal
2. Mr. Laltu Mallik, son of Saikh Kalo Mallik, Khelser Chak village, Purba Bhagabatipur, under the jurisdiction of Chanditala police station, Hoogly district, West Bengal state
3. Mr. Jakir Mallik, son of Jadu Mallik, Nababpur village, under the jurisdiction of Chanditala police station, Hoogly district, West Bengal state

I am writing to you to express my concern regarding the death of Ms. Kashmira Khatun, aged 16 years , daughter of Sk. Mainuddin, resident of Khelser Chak village, Purba Bhagabatipur, under the jurisdiction of Chanditala police station, Hoogly district, West Bengal state that happened on 23 October 2007 and the manner in which the local police is investigating into the case. I am informed that upon information regarding the death of Kashmira in suspicious circumstances the Chanditala police has registered two cases, one as case number 136 of 24 October 2006 as a case of murder and destruction of evidence and case number 59 of 24 October 2006 as a case of unnatural death.

I am concerned to know that two suspects Mr. Laltu Mallik and Mr. Jakir Mallik though has been brought to the notice of the local police by the father of the deceased women, the local police have not questioned them regarding their possible involvement in the crime. The father of the deceased, Mr. Mainuddin, suspects that the above two persons are involved in the crime and that the local police is not questioning them owing to the illegal nexus between them and the local police. I am also informed that instead of investigating the case scientifically the Officer in Charge of Chanditala police station is taking people like Mr. Ensan Mallik and Mr. Subrata Koley into illegal custody and trying to force a confession from them in the case.

I strongly suspect that the motive of the police is not to investigate the crime properly but to somehow get rid of the case charging someone with the crime. I am concerned to know about the state of affairs of the investigation into the case and the very fact that the Officer in Charge of Chanditala police station is detaining persons for days together at the police station without producing them before a local magistrate. I am aware that this procedure is a violation of the existing guidelines of the Supreme Court of India in the D. K. Basu case and that such acts call for an immediate contempt of court action against the police officer.

I therefore urge you to take immediate action in the case ordering an impartial and scientific investigation into the case and also to order a separate investigation into the alleged acts of violation of rules and procedures by the Officer in Charge of the Chanditala police station. The officer must be immediately removed from active service and his conduct investigated and punished if found guilty. The entire investigation into the case must be completed in a reasonable period of time and the accused brought to trial at the earliest.

Yours sincerely,


Appeal no.2

Dear Sir or Madam:,

INDIA: Two minor boys allegedly shot dead by the Indian Border Security Force

Name of victims:
1. Asif Iqbal, aged 13, son of Mr. Asmat Sk., the student of class Vll, Section ‘C’ Roll No. 48 of the Katlamari High School, the resident of Ramnagar Para village, Katlamari, Raninagar police station, Murshidabad district, West Bengal, India
2. Sahin Sk., aged about 15, son of Mr. Jalil Sk., the student of class Vl, Section ‘E’ Roll No. 2 of the Katlamari High School
Alleged perpetrators: Personnel of 140 Battalion posting at the Kaharpara Border Out Post (BOP)
Place of incidence: 4 kilometers inside the Indian territory from the International Border Pillar
Date of incident: At around 10:30pm on 1 April 2007

I am writing to you to express my concern regarding the murder of two boys named above by the BSF stationed at 140 Battalion, posted at Kaharpara Border Out Post. I am informed that both boys were students of the Katlamari High School and were taken into custody with the cattle they were allegedly trying to take across the Indo-Bangladesh border. I am concerned to know that both boys were allegedly shot at by the BSF immediately after they were taken into custody. There are no reasons why two boys be shot at by the BSF even if they were to commit a crime.

I am also informed that the bodies of the boys were produced at the Raninagar police station on the next day where the bodies were kept without being examined by a medical doctor for hours. I am also informed that a case has been registered against the boys, which by now makes no sense since the boys are dead.

I am deeply worried about the increasing number of instances where the BSF stationed along the Indo-Bangladesh border is killing persons on mere suspicion and the fact that none of these cases were investigated by the local police or by any other agency. I am sure that this manner in dealing with cases of custodial death has resulted in providing complete impunity to the BSF in the locality.

I therefore urge you to immediately order an investigation into the matter and take appropriate action against the BSF officers involved in this case. I also urge you to consider investigating several other cases that have been brought to your notice by the Asian Human Rights Commission where the BSF has allegedly murdered persons in Murshidabad district.

I also urge you to take appropriate measures to award interim compensation to the victims’ families and also ensure that the BSF officers responsible for the murder of two minor boys are charged and prosecuted for murder.
I look for your urgent intervention into this matter.

Sincerely your’s,


Appeal no.3

Dear Sir or Madam:,

INDIA: Apparent police inaction into the alleged constant assaults and threats against a man

Name of victim: Mr. Susanta Mondal, aged 38, son of Mr. Panchu Gopal Mondal, the resident of Sitakundu village, Sitakundu post office, Baruipur police station, South 24 Parganas district, West Bengal state, India
Alleged perpetrators:
1) Mr. Medo Naskar, 2) Jado Naskar, 3) Pradip Naskar, 4) Pradip Halder, 5) Sudip Mondal
(Alleged perpetrators from number 1 to 5 are members of one Matry Sangha Club at Sitakundu village)
6) Mr. Ghosh, Sub Inspector of the Baruipur police station, South 24 Parganas district, West Bengal, India
7) The Officer-in-charge of the Baruipur police station
8) Dr. M R Gupta and super of Baruipur State General Hospital
Place of Incident: Premises of the victim’s house
Date of Incident: From 2005 to 6 March 2007

I am deeply concerned by the apparent police inaction into the alleged constant assault and threats against one man named Mr. Susanta Mondal by the Matry Sangha Club, organized by the Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI) which is a youth front of the West Bengal ruling party, the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M).

To briefly explain the incident, in 2005, some members of the said club suddenly demanded half portion of the residential house of Mr. Susanta Mondal for the playing ground of the club. When Mr. Susanta Mondal refused their demands, a group of 25-30 persons along with the said club members allegedly broke the boundary wall of his house and also bombed at toilet of his house and physically assaulted him and his family members. 

Mr. Susanta Mondal then lodged a complaint at the Baruipur police station regarding this matter and subsequently a case was registered against these persons under sections 127/147/148/436/448/323/325 of Indian Penal Code (case no. 203/2006 at the Baruipur police station). However, all the accused persons except three managed to get an anticipatory bail from the court and even the three arrested persons were in custody only for 15 days. As a result, Mr. Susanta Mondal has allegedly received continuous threats by the alleged perpetrators. 

I am informed that despite Mr. Susanta Mondal’s repeated complaints regarding this matter, the Baruipur police refused to register any of his complaints as a FIR, while merely registered his complaints as a General Diary (GD no. 764 dated on 08/05/06, GD no. 1046 dated on 17/07/06 and another GD dated on 17/07/2006). The victim complaints that the Baruipur police further advised him to settle the matter with the alleged perpetrators.

I am also informed that when on at around 5:00pm on 6 March 2007, Mr. Susanta Mondal was brutally assaulted by the alleged perpetrators including the five persons mentioned above with iron rod. The victim was then taken to the Baruipur police, who sent him to the Baruipur State General Hospital. However, due to the alleged influence of the alleged perpetrators, the doctors of Baruipur State General Hospital refused to admit Mr. Susanta Mondal and advised that he gets admission at the Bangur Hospital in Kolkata. I am also informed that Dr. M R Gupta of the Baruipur State General Hospital allegedly recorded in his medical report that the victim’s injuries were caused by the bamboo sticks, which is not true at all. Mr. Susanta Mondal was then taken to the Bangur Hospital in Kolkata, where he was admitted for 8-9 days for the medical treatment.

I am further informed that although Mr. Subol Mondal, the victim’s elder brother, lodged a complaint at the Baruipur police station regarding this assault case on March 7 (case no. 86 dated 07/03/07), the police did not attempt to arrest the alleged perpetrators. Instead of taking action against the alleged perpetrators, the police allegedly told the victim’s family not to agitate this incident.

I am informed that due to apparent police inaction, the perpetrators are freely threatening the victim’s family and the eyewitness of the incident everyday and told them not to disclose anything about the incident. As a result, the victim and his family are living in great fear for their lives. Mr. Susanta Mondal alleges that the accused persons could escape from the punishment due to political influence.

In light of the above, I strongly urge you to order an immediate and impartial investigation into this matter. The investigation should be conducted by an independent agency, not by the local police, considering their apparent and deliberate inaction into this case for the last two years. I also urge you to take strong steps to arrest and prosecute the alleged perpetrators so that they can be punished by law as soon as possible. Effective protection should also be provided to the victim and his family and the victim’s property should be protected as well.  I further request you to take disciplinary sanction against the officers the Baruipur police station for their negligence into this case. An inquiry should also be conducted into the alleged false medical report and a proper action should be taken against the concerned medical officer. Lastly, I again urge the Government of India ratify the United Nations Convention against Torture (CAT) without further delay.

Your’s truly,



Edited , printed , published owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ # LIG-2 / 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,


INDIA……………………cell :09341820313
home page :  , , ,
contact :  ,


Hello world!

March 9, 2008

Welcome to This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!